Difference between revisions of "CountingDaq 220902"

From Moller Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ Back to Main Page >> Data Acquisition Meetings >> Counting mode DAQ meetings Counting...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
Back to [[Main_Page|Main Page]] >>  [[DAQ Meetings|Data Acquisition Meetings]] >>  [[DAQ Meetings#Counting mode DAQ meetings|Counting mode DAQ meetings]]
 
Back to [[Main_Page|Main Page]] >>  [[DAQ Meetings|Data Acquisition Meetings]] >>  [[DAQ Meetings#Counting mode DAQ meetings|Counting mode DAQ meetings]]
  
[[CountingDaq_220819 | previous meeting]] <<  >> [[CountingDaq_220923 | following meeting]]
+
[[CountingDaq_220819 | previous meeting]] <<  >> [[CountingDaq_220930 | following meeting]]
  
 
== Meeting information ==
 
== Meeting information ==
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
==  Minutes ==
 
==  Minutes ==
Recording on Zoom:   
+
Recording on Zoom:  [https://jlab-org.zoomgov.com/rec/share/zBLYHFqFvO-GvGFV8oepyEfH5DPeeI3XP2F1XVYNhIs51sQ3bWs0l_BAaCrI_93V.95NWQemW_IDNNm-5?startTime=1662133580000]
  
Participants:
+
Participants: R. Michaels, D. Armstrong, B. Moffit, P. King, J. Fast
 +
 
 +
*  Update on HDMI cable test results (Armstrong)
 +
**  Evaristo had not been able to find the data from the 2015 tests of HDMI cables, but will look further when he returns home
 +
**  Evaristo and Roberto will be at JLab in 2nd half of September; they will
 +
*  David will check with Evaristo about what they know about the radiation hardness of the MPDs.  He mentions that SBS hasn't had radiation issues for the MPDs, but this isn't a quantitative statement.
 +
**  Recall from Zuhal's study that the MPD location is projected to get several kRad over the course of the experiment, so it's really a question if the MPDs are rad-sensitive as compared to commercial electronics
 +
*  Kate is continuing to push to get the simulation of the Xray/soft photon environment at the GEMs, but this has been very computationally intensive
 +
**  David confirmed that they're using the same libraries as were used for the SBS simulations, and that the SBS simulation backgrounds were within a factor of about 2 or 3 from what was seen during their run
 +
*  Discussion of the TDR

Latest revision as of 23:15, 29 September 2022

Back to Main Page >> Data Acquisition Meetings >> Counting mode DAQ meetings

previous meeting << >> following meeting

Meeting information

 Meeting time:  12:00pm Eastern
   
 Zoom connection information
 Join ZoomGov Meeting
 https://jlab-org.zoomgov.com/j/1603800887?pwd=aXVmSnN6aWZWN3RBdXB4RUhGckZJdz09
 
 Meeting ID: 160 380 0887
 Passcode: 903612
 US Tool free phone: (833) 568 8864
 Find your local number: https://jlab-org.zoomgov.com/u/ab8341cjcG

Agenda

  • Activity updates
  • General discussion

Minutes

Recording on Zoom: [1]

Participants: R. Michaels, D. Armstrong, B. Moffit, P. King, J. Fast

  • Update on HDMI cable test results (Armstrong)
    • Evaristo had not been able to find the data from the 2015 tests of HDMI cables, but will look further when he returns home
    • Evaristo and Roberto will be at JLab in 2nd half of September; they will
  • David will check with Evaristo about what they know about the radiation hardness of the MPDs. He mentions that SBS hasn't had radiation issues for the MPDs, but this isn't a quantitative statement.
    • Recall from Zuhal's study that the MPD location is projected to get several kRad over the course of the experiment, so it's really a question if the MPDs are rad-sensitive as compared to commercial electronics
  • Kate is continuing to push to get the simulation of the Xray/soft photon environment at the GEMs, but this has been very computationally intensive
    • David confirmed that they're using the same libraries as were used for the SBS simulations, and that the SBS simulation backgrounds were within a factor of about 2 or 3 from what was seen during their run
  • Discussion of the TDR