Difference between revisions of "Simulation Meeting October 20 2020 12PM ET"
From Moller Wiki
(Created page with "Back to Main Page >> Simulation Meetings previous meeting << >> Simulation_Meeting...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Back to [[Main_Page|Main Page]] >> [[Simulation_Meetings | Simulation Meetings]] | Back to [[Main_Page|Main Page]] >> [[Simulation_Meetings | Simulation Meetings]] | ||
| − | [[Simulation_Meeting_October_6_2020_12PM_ET | previous meeting]] << >> [[ | + | [[Simulation_Meeting_October_6_2020_12PM_ET | previous meeting]] << >> [[Simulation_Meeting_October_27_2020_12PM_ET | following meeting]] |
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
=Agenda= | =Agenda= | ||
| − | # | + | # SAM update |
| + | # Coil radiation dose update - Sakib and Nazanin | ||
| + | # Remoll Pull request summary - Wouter | ||
=Attendance= | =Attendance= | ||
| + | Ruben Flair, Rakitha, Yufan Chen, Ciprian Gal, David Flay, Chandan Ghosh, , Wouter Deconinck, nazanin roshanshah, sakib, Jim Fast, Dustin McNulty, Cameron Clarke | ||
=Minutes= | =Minutes= | ||
| + | * Vassu is following up on SAM regions and will have results soon. Ciprian will remind Vassu to check on if we can get away with half-inch tube at the neckdown region | ||
| + | * Sakib showed the Nazanin's preliminary progress on coil geometry and radiation load | ||
| + | ** The tungsten shield thickness was varied from 1 mm to 2.5 mm. | ||
| + | ** It seems to plateau at around 2 mm and seems like the optimal thickness. | ||
| + | ** This tungsten shield is for coil radiation coming from acceptance. | ||
| + | ** Ruben wanted to know which version of the coil geometry segmented V1.3 | ||
| + | ** He wanted to know if there is space to place 2 mm shielding. Chandan confirmed that the area where we are shielding has sufficient space for a 2 mm thick tungsten. | ||
| + | * Nazanin also looking at two bounce tungsten shield thickness. | ||
| + | ** She reduced it to 3 mm where the original thickness was about 6 mm while Keeping the tungsten coil shield to 2 mm | ||
| + | ** The goal is to see if we can get away with reduced two bounce shield thickness since we get less radiation on the coil from the beampipe and beam going to dump. | ||
| + | ** Chandan did the original study about two bounce shield thickness: [https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/15JF94uxRGxMk7YnDEV1pnwdbSk5KQSMQOahlGAeAEWs/edit#slide=id.g76be35cceb_0_8] | ||
| + | * Wouter reminded participants to take a look at the Pull requests to be merged today. | ||
Latest revision as of 02:25, 26 October 2020
Back to Main Page >> Simulation Meetings
previous meeting << >> following meeting
Contents
[hide]Agenda
- SAM update
- Coil radiation dose update - Sakib and Nazanin
- Remoll Pull request summary - Wouter
Attendance
Ruben Flair, Rakitha, Yufan Chen, Ciprian Gal, David Flay, Chandan Ghosh, , Wouter Deconinck, nazanin roshanshah, sakib, Jim Fast, Dustin McNulty, Cameron Clarke
Minutes
- Vassu is following up on SAM regions and will have results soon. Ciprian will remind Vassu to check on if we can get away with half-inch tube at the neckdown region
- Sakib showed the Nazanin's preliminary progress on coil geometry and radiation load
- The tungsten shield thickness was varied from 1 mm to 2.5 mm.
- It seems to plateau at around 2 mm and seems like the optimal thickness.
- This tungsten shield is for coil radiation coming from acceptance.
- Ruben wanted to know which version of the coil geometry segmented V1.3
- He wanted to know if there is space to place 2 mm shielding. Chandan confirmed that the area where we are shielding has sufficient space for a 2 mm thick tungsten.
- Nazanin also looking at two bounce tungsten shield thickness.
- She reduced it to 3 mm where the original thickness was about 6 mm while Keeping the tungsten coil shield to 2 mm
- The goal is to see if we can get away with reduced two bounce shield thickness since we get less radiation on the coil from the beampipe and beam going to dump.
- Chandan did the original study about two bounce shield thickness: [1]
- Wouter reminded participants to take a look at the Pull requests to be merged today.
bluejeans information
Meeting ID 635010453
Meeting URL
https://bluejeans.com/635010453
Here are more details about the meeting connection:
Connecting directly from a room system? 1) Dial: 199.48.152.152 or bjn.vc 2) Enter Meeting ID: 635 010 453
Just want to dial in on your phone? 1) +1.408.740.7256 (US)
+1.888.240.2560 (US Toll Free) +1.408.317.9253 (Alternate number)
2) Enter Meeting ID: 635 010 453 3) Press #
Return to Simulation Meetings
Return to Main Page
