Difference between revisions of "Optics Meeting Sep 20 2022 230PM ET"
From Moller Wiki
(→Agenda) |
(→Agenda) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
=Agenda= | =Agenda= | ||
| − | #(David) More on the low-energy gamma simulations | + | #(David) More on the low-energy gamma simulations |
| − | #(Kate) Quick update on GEM thickness study [https://dilbert.physics.wm.edu/MOLLER+Simulation/ | + | #(Kate) Quick update on GEM thickness study [https://dilbert.physics.wm.edu/MOLLER+Simulation/220920_153241/Quick_Summary_of_GEM_Thickness_Study_(1).pdf] |
##(Kate) Detailed update [https://dilbert.physics.wm.edu/MOLLER+Simulation/142] | ##(Kate) Detailed update [https://dilbert.physics.wm.edu/MOLLER+Simulation/142] | ||
=Attendance= | =Attendance= | ||
| + | Vassu, David, Zuhal, Kate, Ciprian, Paul S., Bill, Brynna | ||
=Minutes= | =Minutes= | ||
| + | #(David)low-energy gammas mainly coming from somewhere in beam dump, at least in present simulation. How? Why does the simulation see no 511 keV annihilation gammas? Looks like source may be the beam diffuser - need to overlay the present vertices plot with better map of the dump geometry. Some ideas - a standalone simple GEANT4 of just the water in the beam dump, to see what the flux of backward-going low-energy gammas is (order of magnitude). | ||
| + | #(Kate) initial results suggest that addition of 8% radiation length scintillator does not make much difference to our optics data. | ||
=Meeting link information= | =Meeting link information= | ||
Latest revision as of 14:30, 13 October 2022
Back to Main Page >> Optics Meetings
Contents
[hide]Agenda
- (David) More on the low-energy gamma simulations
- (Kate) Quick update on GEM thickness study [1]
- (Kate) Detailed update [2]
Attendance
Vassu, David, Zuhal, Kate, Ciprian, Paul S., Bill, Brynna
Minutes
- (David)low-energy gammas mainly coming from somewhere in beam dump, at least in present simulation. How? Why does the simulation see no 511 keV annihilation gammas? Looks like source may be the beam diffuser - need to overlay the present vertices plot with better map of the dump geometry. Some ideas - a standalone simple GEANT4 of just the water in the beam dump, to see what the flux of backward-going low-energy gammas is (order of magnitude).
- (Kate) initial results suggest that addition of 8% radiation length scintillator does not make much difference to our optics data.
Meeting link information
Meeting URL
https://cwm.zoom.us/j/97259755403?pwd=WTRqVHJnZ3RQa1IwNHdMQjJuQm9FZz09
Meeting ID: 972 5975 5403
Passcode: 4937
Return to Optics Meetings
Return to Main Page
