Difference between revisions of "IntegrationDaq 210212"
From Moller Wiki
(→Agenda) |
(→Minutes) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
− | * Activity updates | + | * Activity updates |
− | * Discussion of preliminary design review, tentatively planned for a half-day in mid March. We | + | ** Stripline BPM signal levels ([[Media:stripline_signal_levels.pdf|slide]]): Maybe best choice is an adaptation module to convert from single-ended to differential signal and match voltage accepted by ADC? |
+ | * Discussion of preliminary design review, tentatively planned for a half-day in mid March. We intend this to cover the integrating DAQ, counting DAQ, and the new BCM electronics. Integrating DAQ topics may include: | ||
** Overall scheme of integrating DAQ | ** Overall scheme of integrating DAQ | ||
** Some details about the integrating ADCs? | ** Some details about the integrating ADCs? | ||
Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
== Minutes == | == Minutes == | ||
− | Participants: | + | Participants: R. Michaels, B. Moffit, M. Gericke, W. Gu, J. Pan, B. Blaikie, D. Bishop, C. Cuevas, B. Shaw |
+ | |||
+ | * Stripline BPM signal levels | ||
+ | ** Daryl reports that it would be possible to design a modified integrating ADC module that would take single-ended inputs instead of differential inputs. This would require some changes in the front end filter, but he expects the overall changes are modest. | ||
+ | ** With the single ended input, the full scale range would be about +/-4V. Then to get the 5V range we need for the striplines we could use attenuators on the input. | ||
+ | ** What is the output impedance of the stripline sample and hold modules? | ||
+ | ** Another idea would be the the front panel (and input filter) could be made as a separate board that would then connect to the main board. | ||
+ | ** Bob, Michael, and I should have a follow up discussion about these options | ||
+ | * Presentation of summary table in Integrating Electronics document | ||
+ | ** Daryl cautions that in order to achive the 1 MHz bandwidth with a 1 MOhm transimpedance, we'll need to be very careful with the design of the amplifier. | ||
+ | ** We may want to use RG59 for the cable between pmt and amplifier, as it has lower capacitance than RG58 | ||
+ | * Design review discussion | ||
+ | ** We should detail all types of inputs that we might want to put into the integrating ADCS. What types of I/O are people expecting to have with the ADC? | ||
+ | *** Bryan suggests having an external clock input, trigger input, and sync input | ||
+ | *** Bob suggests having some diagnostic output |
Latest revision as of 15:57, 26 February 2021
Back to Main Page >> Data Acquisition Meetings >> Integrating mode DAQ meetings
previous meeting << >> following meeting
Meeting information
Meeting time: 3:30pm Eastern BlueJeans calling instructions: Toll-Free Number (U.S.& Canada): 888-240-2560 Other BlueJeans access phone numbers are listed at https://www.bluejeans.com/premium-numbers Bluejeans CODE: 641 252 323 Bluejeans link: https://bluejeans.com/641252323
Agenda
- Activity updates
- Stripline BPM signal levels (slide): Maybe best choice is an adaptation module to convert from single-ended to differential signal and match voltage accepted by ADC?
- Discussion of preliminary design review, tentatively planned for a half-day in mid March. We intend this to cover the integrating DAQ, counting DAQ, and the new BCM electronics. Integrating DAQ topics may include:
- Overall scheme of integrating DAQ
- Some details about the integrating ADCs?
- Interfaces to other subsystems
- Grounding scheme?
- Other topics?
- General discussion
Minutes
Participants: R. Michaels, B. Moffit, M. Gericke, W. Gu, J. Pan, B. Blaikie, D. Bishop, C. Cuevas, B. Shaw
- Stripline BPM signal levels
- Daryl reports that it would be possible to design a modified integrating ADC module that would take single-ended inputs instead of differential inputs. This would require some changes in the front end filter, but he expects the overall changes are modest.
- With the single ended input, the full scale range would be about +/-4V. Then to get the 5V range we need for the striplines we could use attenuators on the input.
- What is the output impedance of the stripline sample and hold modules?
- Another idea would be the the front panel (and input filter) could be made as a separate board that would then connect to the main board.
- Bob, Michael, and I should have a follow up discussion about these options
- Presentation of summary table in Integrating Electronics document
- Daryl cautions that in order to achive the 1 MHz bandwidth with a 1 MOhm transimpedance, we'll need to be very careful with the design of the amplifier.
- We may want to use RG59 for the cable between pmt and amplifier, as it has lower capacitance than RG58
- Design review discussion
- We should detail all types of inputs that we might want to put into the integrating ADCS. What types of I/O are people expecting to have with the ADC?
- Bryan suggests having an external clock input, trigger input, and sync input
- Bob suggests having some diagnostic output
- We should detail all types of inputs that we might want to put into the integrating ADCS. What types of I/O are people expecting to have with the ADC?