Difference between revisions of "Pion Meeting March 8 2023 1:00PM ET"
From Moller Wiki
(Created page with "Back to Main Page >> Pion Meetings Zoom link: https://jlab-org.zoomgov.com/j/1608212513?pwd=M25LR1hzN3hLWm0xaFFETjZ0U1lQZz09 =Agenda= =Att...") |
(→Minutes) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
=Minutes= | =Minutes= | ||
| + | # (David) Tristan Hurst has made good progress with an ML algorithm for pion/electron classification using a Random Forest Classifier from SciKit Learn; seems to work well with GENT 4 simulated Moller and pion generator events. Some initial notes are here: [https://dilbert.physics.wm.edu/Pion+Detector/104]. Tristan hs time conflict with the pion meetings; may set up and ad-hoc pion meeting for him to show his results. Will ensure code and documentation is uploaded to git for posterity. | ||
| + | # No updates from Simona on PMT gain tests. | ||
| + | # (Wouter/Elham) Should we consider pion detector testing with the pi/mu/e mixed beams available at TRIUM in M11? The 80 MeV/c beam is below the Cerenkov threshold, but the 150 MeV beam should be above. Might be useful for understanding the response of the detectors to low-energy electrons, for example. | ||
# | # | ||
Revision as of 18:41, 15 March 2023
Back to Main Page >> Pion Meetings
Zoom link: https://jlab-org.zoomgov.com/j/1608212513?pwd=M25LR1hzN3hLWm0xaFFETjZ0U1lQZz09
Agenda
Attendance
Sudip, Elham, David, Wouter, Carl, Kate, Dustin
Minutes
- (David) Tristan Hurst has made good progress with an ML algorithm for pion/electron classification using a Random Forest Classifier from SciKit Learn; seems to work well with GENT 4 simulated Moller and pion generator events. Some initial notes are here: [1]. Tristan hs time conflict with the pion meetings; may set up and ad-hoc pion meeting for him to show his results. Will ensure code and documentation is uploaded to git for posterity.
- No updates from Simona on PMT gain tests.
- (Wouter/Elham) Should we consider pion detector testing with the pi/mu/e mixed beams available at TRIUM in M11? The 80 MeV/c beam is below the Cerenkov threshold, but the 150 MeV beam should be above. Might be useful for understanding the response of the detectors to low-energy electrons, for example.
