Difference between revisions of "Pion Meeting March 26 2021 11AM ET"
From Moller Wiki
(→Minutes) |
(→Attendance) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
=Attendance= | =Attendance= | ||
| − | David, Elham, Raj, Wouter | + | David, Elham, Raj, Jim, Wouter |
=Minutes= | =Minutes= | ||
Revision as of 15:21, 26 March 2021
Back to Main Page >> Pion Meetings
- Bluejeans link: 420 107 252
- Dial-in: 408-740-7256 (US), 888-240-2560 (US Toll Free), 408-317-9253 (Alternate number)
Agenda
- Updates on pion detector studies (Elham) [1]
- Beam generator simulations (Raj)
Attendance
David, Elham, Raj, Jim, Wouter
Minutes
- Elham: pion detector simulations with moller and pion generator
- Effect of moving lucite detector inwards has a smaller effect than increasing donut outer radius on the pi/e photo-electron rate
- Combination of 26 cm lead donut, with shorter (6cm) and shifted lucite (same inner edge of lucite) gives good result
- Changing concrete and lead radial and longitudinal thickness independently:
- lead has most impact, but thinner lead at larger radial extent is also good
- Showermax mirror box bug fixed and wall thickness reduced
- no effect on ratios
- Reduce thickness off donut support flanges from 0.75" to 0.01"
- no effect on ratios
- Effect of moving lucite detector inwards has a smaller effect than increasing donut outer radius on the pi/e photo-electron rate
- Raj: pion detector simulations with beam generator
- rates consistent with moller generator results from Elham
- but photo-electron rates appear consistent with zero
