Difference between revisions of "CountingDaq 201209"
From Moller Wiki
(→Agenda) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Back to [[Main_Page|Main Page]] >> [[DAQ Meetings|Data Acquisition Meetings]] >> [[DAQ Meetings#Counting mode DAQ meetings|Counting mode DAQ meetings]] | Back to [[Main_Page|Main Page]] >> [[DAQ Meetings|Data Acquisition Meetings]] >> [[DAQ Meetings#Counting mode DAQ meetings|Counting mode DAQ meetings]] | ||
| − | [[CountingDaq_201209 | previous meeting]] << >> [[ | + | [[CountingDaq_201209 | previous meeting]] << >> [[CountingDaq_210106 | following meeting]] |
== Meeting information == | == Meeting information == | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
| − | * Brief review of conceptual design | + | * Brief review of conceptual design: [https://moller.jlab.org/wiki/images/Pking_countingdaq_20201209.pdf] |
| − | ** DAQ talk | + | ** Full DAQ talk from May 2020 collaboration meeting: [https://moller.jlab.org/cgi-bin/DocDB/private/ShowDocument?docid=602 DocDB 602] |
* General discussion | * General discussion | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Minutes == | ||
| + | Participants: R. Michaels, H. Liu, D .Armstrong, B. Moffit, P. King | ||
| + | |||
| + | * DA points out that with all 7 sectors instrumented with GEMS & scintillators, plus two pion detector sectors, we will have 18 trigger scintillator signals | ||
| + | ** We will need to add another FADC and discriminator to the plan to accommodate the added PMTs | ||
| + | * BM recommends replacing the TS+TD in VXS crate #3 by a TI-master. He also recommends shifting the MPD modules to a separate crate (can be a basic VME, and may not need a CPU) and adding more SSP modules to make the GEM readout faster. | ||
| + | ** To have a better feel for this, we need to get some more information about the GEM readout parameters. PK has sent a message to Nilanga to get some feedback from him | ||
| + | * Discussion about triggering modes | ||
| + | ** At ~100nA (roughly 30 MHz/sector), we'd probably run a pulser trigger and find "good hits" in the analysis. BM says that the TI has an internal pulser trigger and an internal random trigger. | ||
| + | ** At ~100pA (roughly 30 kHz/sector), we would likely use the detector-based triggering | ||
Latest revision as of 20:22, 5 January 2021
Back to Main Page >> Data Acquisition Meetings >> Counting mode DAQ meetings
previous meeting << >> following meeting
Meeting information
Meeting time: 2:00pm Eastern BlueJeans calling instructions: Toll-Free Number (U.S.& Canada): 888-240-2560 Other BlueJeans access phone numbers are listed at https://www.bluejeans.com/premium-numbers Bluejeans CODE: 411 309 650 Bluejeans link: https://bluejeans.com/411309650
Agenda
- Brief review of conceptual design: [1]
- Full DAQ talk from May 2020 collaboration meeting: DocDB 602
- General discussion
Minutes
Participants: R. Michaels, H. Liu, D .Armstrong, B. Moffit, P. King
- DA points out that with all 7 sectors instrumented with GEMS & scintillators, plus two pion detector sectors, we will have 18 trigger scintillator signals
- We will need to add another FADC and discriminator to the plan to accommodate the added PMTs
- BM recommends replacing the TS+TD in VXS crate #3 by a TI-master. He also recommends shifting the MPD modules to a separate crate (can be a basic VME, and may not need a CPU) and adding more SSP modules to make the GEM readout faster.
- To have a better feel for this, we need to get some more information about the GEM readout parameters. PK has sent a message to Nilanga to get some feedback from him
- Discussion about triggering modes
- At ~100nA (roughly 30 MHz/sector), we'd probably run a pulser trigger and find "good hits" in the analysis. BM says that the TI has an internal pulser trigger and an internal random trigger.
- At ~100pA (roughly 30 kHz/sector), we would likely use the detector-based triggering
