Difference between revisions of "Simulation Meeting January 31 2019 2PM ET"

From Moller Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 25: Line 25:
 
#* ChG: output from offset study make sense.
 
#* ChG: output from offset study make sense.
 
#* ChG: recalculations of collimator powers were showing some odd behavior. Wouter pointed out this was related to a recent bug that was fixed regarding the kryptonite materials. This was fixed and the cross check is sensible. CG: there still seem to be some inconsistencies with the hit.e . WD: the hit.e contains the energy in the postStep so if kryptonite is true it will just have the rest mass. CG: the number of entries seems to be inconsistent between hit.e and hit.edep. Please plot the overflow and underflow bins without energy cuts.  
 
#* ChG: recalculations of collimator powers were showing some odd behavior. Wouter pointed out this was related to a recent bug that was fixed regarding the kryptonite materials. This was fixed and the cross check is sensible. CG: there still seem to be some inconsistencies with the hit.e . WD: the hit.e contains the energy in the postStep so if kryptonite is true it will just have the rest mass. CG: the number of entries seems to be inconsistent between hit.e and hit.edep. Please plot the overflow and underflow bins without energy cuts.  
#* ChG: the deleteKrypMaterial method doesn’t work currently.
+
#* ChG: the deleteKrypMaterial method doesn’t work currently. WD: won't be fixed for technical reasons.
 
# Wouter: next time
 
# Wouter: next time
  
 
<br><br> Return to [[Simulation_Meetings | Simulation Meetings]]
 
<br><br> Return to [[Simulation_Meetings | Simulation Meetings]]
 
<br> Return to [[Main_Page|Main Page]]
 
<br> Return to [[Main_Page|Main Page]]

Revision as of 15:35, 4 February 2019

Back to Main Page >> Simulation Meetings

previous meeting << >> following meeting



Task List Summary


Agenda

  • Simulation software updates
    • Demonstration of MadGraph5, current status (Wouter)
  • Collimator energy deposit update (Chandan) slides

Attendance:

Attendance: Michael G, Sakib R, Chandan G, Ciprian G, Cameron C, Wouter D

Minutes

  1. Chandan
    • ChG: output from offset study make sense.
    • ChG: recalculations of collimator powers were showing some odd behavior. Wouter pointed out this was related to a recent bug that was fixed regarding the kryptonite materials. This was fixed and the cross check is sensible. CG: there still seem to be some inconsistencies with the hit.e . WD: the hit.e contains the energy in the postStep so if kryptonite is true it will just have the rest mass. CG: the number of entries seems to be inconsistent between hit.e and hit.edep. Please plot the overflow and underflow bins without energy cuts.
    • ChG: the deleteKrypMaterial method doesn’t work currently. WD: won't be fixed for technical reasons.
  2. Wouter: next time



Return to Simulation Meetings
Return to Main Page