Difference between revisions of "Simulation Meeting November 11 2024 1030AM ET"
From Moller Wiki
(Created page with "Back to Main Page >> Simulation Meetings previous meeting << >> Simulation_Mee...") |
(→Agenda for Today) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
=Agenda for Today= | =Agenda for Today= | ||
| − | # hyperon background study | + | # [https://moller-docdb.physics.sunysb.edu/DocDB/0011/001167/002/SImulationMeetingHyperonSim_11_11_2024.pdf hyperon background study] |
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
=Minutes= | =Minutes= | ||
| − | * | + | |
| + | *David asked about the possibility of running the code at different beam energies in future in case we have to run at a different beam energy for some reason. So It is good to preserve the code used for this analysis preferably in git hub and with well written documentation for future use. | ||
| + | *Currently electro-production assumes 11 GeV electron and no radiative loss before vertex and this lead to the discussion about How to combine electro-production and photo-production to get total rates and asymmetries. | ||
| + | There was also some discussion about bremsstrahlung photon doing photo-production as well as radiated electron doing electro-production. Sso we need to make sure we are not over or under counting interaction when we combine electro and photo production | ||
Latest revision as of 15:51, 22 November 2024
Back to Main Page >> Simulation Meetings
previous meeting << >> following meeting
Agenda for Today
Running Agenda
- Ongoing Hyperon study
- Ongoing Ferrous studies
- ep elastic background study to compare soft and hard scattering: Not yet started
Attendance
Minutes
- David asked about the possibility of running the code at different beam energies in future in case we have to run at a different beam energy for some reason. So It is good to preserve the code used for this analysis preferably in git hub and with well written documentation for future use.
- Currently electro-production assumes 11 GeV electron and no radiative loss before vertex and this lead to the discussion about How to combine electro-production and photo-production to get total rates and asymmetries.
There was also some discussion about bremsstrahlung photon doing photo-production as well as radiated electron doing electro-production. Sso we need to make sure we are not over or under counting interaction when we combine electro and photo production
