Difference between revisions of "Pion Meeting April 9 2021 11AM ET"
From Moller Wiki
(Created page with "Back to Main Page >> Pion Meetings * Bluejeans link: [https://bluejeans.com/420107252 420 107 252] * Dial-in: [tel:408-740-7256p420107252# 4...") |
(→Agenda) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
=Agenda= | =Agenda= | ||
− | # Updates on pion detector studies (Elham) | + | # Updates on pion detector studies (Elham) [https://moller.jlab.org/cgi-bin/DocDB/private/ShowDocument?docid=708] |
# Beam generator simulations (Raj) | # Beam generator simulations (Raj) | ||
=Attendance= | =Attendance= | ||
+ | |||
+ | Elham, Wouter, David, Carl | ||
=Minutes= | =Minutes= | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Updates on pion detector studies (Elham) | ||
+ | ** Larger uncertainties on rate when using chunking | ||
+ | *** But why? this is the beam generator and should not have any weighting effects | ||
+ | *** TODO: look at number of events before scaling into rates, then look at rate itself | ||
+ | ** Potentially large rates for only a few events that are shown in scatter plots | ||
+ | *** TODO: Could create histogram of rate (for moller generator) to find high rate events | ||
+ | ** But wait, beam generator: each point is "fair statistical sample" with equal weight | ||
+ | ** Are there pions that reach the lucite in the beam benerator? | ||
+ | *** TODO: Only look at electrons/positrons, not the other types. | ||
+ | ** Visualization still not working | ||
+ | *** TODO: Instead of visualization, just turn up /tracking/verbose for those single events |
Latest revision as of 15:56, 9 April 2021
Back to Main Page >> Pion Meetings
- Bluejeans link: 420 107 252
- Dial-in: 408-740-7256 (US), 888-240-2560 (US Toll Free), 408-317-9253 (Alternate number)
Agenda
- Updates on pion detector studies (Elham) [1]
- Beam generator simulations (Raj)
Attendance
Elham, Wouter, David, Carl
Minutes
- Updates on pion detector studies (Elham)
- Larger uncertainties on rate when using chunking
- But why? this is the beam generator and should not have any weighting effects
- TODO: look at number of events before scaling into rates, then look at rate itself
- Potentially large rates for only a few events that are shown in scatter plots
- TODO: Could create histogram of rate (for moller generator) to find high rate events
- But wait, beam generator: each point is "fair statistical sample" with equal weight
- Are there pions that reach the lucite in the beam benerator?
- TODO: Only look at electrons/positrons, not the other types.
- Visualization still not working
- TODO: Instead of visualization, just turn up /tracking/verbose for those single events
- Larger uncertainties on rate when using chunking